Discussions

When it comes to automation, even the most reliable test scripts can fail unexpectedly—thanks to dynamic objects, network delays, or unforeseen application behavior. That’s why mastering advanced error handling in UFT Software (Unified Functional Testing) is essential for every QA engineer striving for resilient and self-healing tests.

At its core, UFT Software provides multiple mechanisms for dealing with runtime errors gracefully rather than halting execution. The On Error Resume Next statement is a classic approach, allowing scripts to continue even when certain steps fail. But that’s just the starting point. To make your automation smarter, structured error handling through Err.Number checks and recovery scenarios offers more control.

Recovery Scenarios, for instance, enable testers to define how UFT should respond when specific errors occur—like pop-up interruptions or system crashes. By defining triggers (such as window appearance or object state) and recovery operations (like closing a dialog or restarting a test), teams can minimize manual intervention.

Another powerful method involves using custom error handling functions that log issues into external reports or dashboards, ensuring visibility across teams. Combined with conditional logic and checkpoints, these scripts can dynamically decide whether to skip, retry, or flag a test step as failed.

For modern automation pipelines, pairing UFT Software with tools like Keploy can enhance the robustness of your testing strategy. Keploy captures real API traffic and auto-generates test cases with mocks, complementing UFT’s functional testing by ensuring APIs behave reliably even before the UI layer is tested.

Ultimately, error handling isn’t just about fixing crashes—it’s about building trust in your automation. By implementing these advanced techniques, QA teams can reduce false failures, improve execution reliability, and make their UFT test suites far more adaptive in fast-moving Agile environments.